Can you use carbon dating on fossils
Carbon is a radioactive isotope of carbon. Prior to radiometric dating, evolution scientists used index fossils a.
The question should be whether or not carbon can be used to date any artifacts at all? The process of using index fossils is describes by the late Creationist author and Ph.
Carbon dating cannot be used on most fossils, not only because they are almost always allegedly too old, but also because they rarely contain the original carbon of the organism that has been fossilized. These artifacts have gone through many carbon half-lives, and the amount of carbon remaining in them is miniscule and very difficult to detect.
This technique is not restricted to bones; it can also be used on cloth, wood and plant fibers. The mathematical premise undergirding the use of these elements in radiometric dating contains the similar confounding factors that we find in carbon dating method.
Without an accurate starting time, an observable span in between, and an observable finish, our measurement cannot be deemed accurate. A number of processes could cause the parent substance to be depleted at the top of the magma chamber, or the daughter product to be enriched, both of which would cause the lava erupting earlier to appear very old according to radiometric dating, and lava erupting later to appear younger.
This technique is widely used on recent artifacts, but educators and students alike should note that this technique will not work on older fossils like those of the dinosaurs alleged to be millions of years old. If you blindly accept the Theory of Evolution, you are in danger of believing a fairytale for grownups called the Theory of Evolution. All dating methods that support this theory are embraced, while any evidence to the contrary, e.
Only then can you gauge the accuracy and validity of that race.
The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. Scientists attempt to check the accuracy of carbon dating by comparing carbon dating data to data from other dating methods.
Secondly, you must have an observable time span so we can be certain nothing has affected the amount of the radioactive element being measured, e. All radiometric dating methods use this basic can you use carbon dating on fossils to extrapolate the age of artifacts being tested.
While there are many problems with such dating methods, such as parent important questions to ask a girl you are dating daughter substances entering or leaving the rock, e.
Although the half-life of carbon makes it unreliable for dating fossils over about 50, years old, there are other isotopes scientists use to date older artifacts. It would really be nice if geologists would just do a double blind study sometime to find out what the distributions of the ages are.
The assumptions are similar to the assumptions used in carbon dating. Lava erupting earlier would come from the top of the magma chamber, and lava erupting later would come from lower down. Although the half-life of some of them are more consistent with the evolutionary worldview of millions to billions of years, the assumptions used in radiometric dating put the results of all radiometric dating methods in doubt. Scientists now realize that production of carbon has not been constant over the years, but has changed as the radiation from the sun has fluctuated.
In practice, geologists carefully select what rocks they will date, and have many explanations for discordant dates, so it's not clear how such a study could be done, but it might be a good project for creationists. Clearly, it is important to have a good understanding of these processes in order to evaluate the reliability of radiometric dating.